²Ä¤@²Õ

ª«²z¨tÀ³ª«¤T 499220381 §õ¯Ñ¤å [81] [89]

their code does have input option for Deltat

ª«²z¨tÀ³ª«¤T 499220217 ³¯®aÅï [74] [82]

(20121016) add point 1/2 provide a way to plot log_10 by ration conversion method.

(20121023) find angle for longest shot, can do colour change. [OK]

(20121222) no-show

(20121225) 16-4(a) a step in infinite well. can not explain why no x larger than potential wall wrong translation (brackected) [not-OK]

ª«²z¨tÀ³ª«¤T 499220175 ±i¶h°¶ [79] [87]

(20121016) add point 1/2 provide a way to plot log_10 by ration conversion method.

(20121120) Problem 8.2 (first show Deltat=0.001, can do changing and compile successfully) change into Lx = 12. [OK]

(20121222) no-show

(20121225) behaviour of WF approach step (no similation) [half-OK]

ª«²z¨tÀ³ª«¤T 499220290 ªL¸t®x [67] [75]

(20121009.02) just say some number but no explanation on the size od Delta_t, keep saying the dots are sparse and the T curve not smooth enough. (however, the dots looks smooth enough for us.) Use very large gap dots to show that the curve will not be curve but just line if very big Deltat is used. "NOT OK"

(2012.11.27) problem 8.4 (a) the TA-translated prblem text is not accurate, so <I> gave clear explanation of the problem. under the requirement of the problem, he is able to use the modified code to produce expected Delta_E_max vs Delta_t at one selcted t value. [OK]

(20121224) wave packet collision. What probability ? (not correct until thrid trial and been hinted) change initial speed. (change Delta_t, therefore it is incorect) [Not OK]

ª«²z¨tÀ³ª«¤T 499220233 ³¯«Û¦¨ [65] [73]

(20121009.01) check code is logically correct : use original expt data for checking "OK"

(20121204) no-show

(20121222) skip

²Ä¤G²Õ

ª«²z¨tÀ³ª«¤T 499220084 ·¨¤l¼Ý [100] [100]

(20121222) add-point Mawell velocity distribution [OK]

(20121224) add-point enhanced Maxwell distribution [OK]

(20121225) add-points (successfully do triangular and squre packing)

ª«²z¨t¥ú¹q¤T 499210218 ¼ï¤å´ [73] [81]

(20121016) add point : can do sketch plotting of log_10 x and log_2 x.

(20121120) Problem 8.1 plot L-J potentials (use desmos web tool to plot) didn't say red and blue lines, has discussed thhe effect of r on U(r). finding force = 0 is laso correct. [OK]

(20121217) no-show

(20121222) no-show

(20121225) Energy depedence of p and T (8-7(1)) explain velocity scaling. <ask how was T obtained?> (can not answer) (E/T plot not yet reached equibilium) <code wrong> ( why not increase too much ? damage eqiv. /not very correct/) does T scales as expected. <how to change T to 1.1 ?> (misunderstand question) [not-OK]

ª«²z¨tÀ³ª«¤T 499220209 §ù«Û¼ý [80] [88]

(20121023) rate of quantity change proportional to itself, give an example. Given water flow fro a punched hole at side of a tank. [half-OK]

(20121030) add-points. draining a tank. Derive Bernoulli Eq. when applied to tank formula, end up with a wrong Euler algorithm. Didn't explain to my question. [not OK]

(2011.11.27) Problem 8.4 (b)reset linear momentum to consevation of linear momentum, with comparative plots gien [nicely successful] [OK]

(20121204) no-show

ª«²z¨tÀ³ª«¤T 499220266 ªL±ê²[ [82] [90]

(20121009.03) The choice of Deltat based on looking good or bad in the gap of curve.

(20121023) add point. the discussion of delta_t, based on how to make slopemore accurate. [half-added]

(2012.11.27) Problem 8.4 (a), use a mdified MD code to simulate ONLY necessary part and scan the full range of Delta_t and test the Delta_E_max curve using a fitting to shown it is indeed parabolic. [very very good] [OK]

(20121225) 8-8 triangular and square lattice comaprision (wrong translation) correctly predict otential , can not draw L-J potential [half-OK]

²Ä¤T²Õ

²Ä¥|²Õ

ª«²z¨tÀ³ª«¥| 498220085 ³¯µq°¶ [71] [79]

(20121222) no-show

ª«²z¨tÀ³ª«¥| 498220200 ªL·çµX [64] [72]

(20101009.04) Problem 2.a Can Newton's cooling law describe the above phenominuon ? Claim that the simulated curve has agree well with the expt value table.

(2012.11.27) problem 8.3 (3) velocity inversion. to answer whether atoms return to the original locations, two runs, forward and backard, but use the same initial positions, WRONG. [not-OK]

(20121204) skip

(20121218) wave packet hitting a potential barrier. Can exaplin transmition and reflection. Ask her to extend the range (leader can do it). Was able to demonstrate the effect of difference in potential hight. Can not explain what are 1st 2nd, 3rd picture. [half-OK]

(20121222) no-show

ª«²z¨tÀ³ª«¤T 498220093 ªL²ú¹a (°h¿ï)

(20121023) skip once

(20121120) no show

(20121204) no show

ª«²z¨tÀ³ª«¥| 498220101 §õ¼y·½ [63] [71]

(20121120) skip once

(20121204) no show

(20121217) infinite well TDSE, misunderstand the question, should discuss how Psi change with respect to t, intend to discuss how WF change with respect to well width d. When continue to show actual program, can not change the code. Un-prepared. [Not OK]

(20121218) wave packet transmision of a barrier. can not explain the difference of three figures [half-OK]

(20121222) no-show

ª«²z¨tÀ³ª«¥| 498220242 ³¯ªl¤© [60] [68]

(20121120) no show

(20121204) no show

(20121217) skip

(20121218) wave packet motion in flat potential, can not explain what are the four figures (4th figure if potential) [not-OK]

(20121222) no-show

²Ä¤²Õ

ª«²z¨tÀ³ª«¤T 499220399 ªL«Û§» [84] [92]

ª«²z¨tÀ³ª«¤T 401228019 ¶À¤Ö¨¦ [84] [92]

volaunteeir (20121009.05) no count. (20121016) succesfully plot log x. <what is the base value of fortran command log() ? >

(20121023) which way an up throw stone stay in air longer, with friction or without ? <should give more point to make your point more convincing> <Next time provide a list/table to make concusion> [OK]

(20121029) add point, log in fortran. for log_2(x), log_2(x) = log10(x)/log10(2.0) = log(x)/log(2.0) [OK]

(20121120) add-point, problem 8.3-4 reverse (to be improved next time)

(20121204) add-points, problem 8.3-3 reverse done.

(20121222) no-show

(20121225) no-show

ª«²z¨tÀ³ª«¥| 498220275 ±i³Õ¶{ [70] [78]

(20121016) Pb. 2a think newton's cooling law can describe coffee cooling, reason being the shape of newton's cooling solution similar to that of coffee. (said that is a log plot) < how does a log plot look like ?> <find a set of x which is easy to evaluate ln x, then plot them> use other pople's result, can explain code and the shape of ln x. "half OK"

(2012.11.27) Problem 8.5 (a) simulate E and P, [half-OK]

cn operate code, but has problem of converting it into ideal gas formula.

The problem here is how to use units in simulation(20121204) Problem 8.5-2 accumulate T and P only after equliblium arrived. didn't follow the instuction of the proble text, [not-OK] Problem 8.5-3 rescale the size of the system box and positions. P/T ratio drop, confirmed [OK]

ª«²z¨tÀ³ª«¤T 400227137 ¶À¨¹Û [69] [77]

(20121016) Absent. [Not OK]

(20121120) Problem 8.3 (8.2-3 can no successfully compile into N=64) Problem 8.3 can display 11 particles marching, change p(6) to disturbe, also successful [OK]

(20121222) no-show

(20121225) analytically solve eigen function, correct (no simulation) [half-OK]

²Ä¤»²Õ

ª«²z¨tÀ³ª«¤T 499220019 ®]®¶µ¾ [82] [90]

add point : able to plot y = ln x using pglot.

ª«²z¨tÀ³ª«¤T 499220282 ªô«Ø³ó [70] [78]

(20121016) if accept newton cooling law, how to find cooling rate r ? < explain to the class, a formal way of doing this is to do a least square curve fitting on the data of coffee colling curve > Use the formula of newton cooling law, filling in the formula with conjecutive temperature ata points, get one r value. finally average the r value obtained from the entire temperature range. [OK] <should provide standard deviation>

(20121225) [not-OK]

ª«²z¨tÀ³ª«¤T 499220191 ªL®x»õ [63] [71]

(20121022) add cream first or not. small figure, ask him to change plot size, don't know how, instructut him to edit pgpa it then works. later he explain the two colour lines stop at 45 and 50 degrees automatically by program. and was able to shown correctly the results. [OK]

(20121218) no-show

(20121222) no-show

ª«²z¨tÀ³ª«¤T 499220340 ½²ÌÉõ [68] [76]

(20121023) what curves looks like butminton and steel balls ? (code not yet ready, use example code) use only mass to distinguish the difference, not good in discussion, use same KE as initial. [half-OK]

(20121205) skip

(20121217) no-show

(20121218) no-show

(20121225) bound state eigenvalue 16-8(a) , mis-understand criterion, but can get right answer when correctly operate code [half-OK]

ª«²z¨tÀ³ª«¤T 499220423 §f¬R½n (°h¿ï)

(20121120) no-show, then skip

(20121127) no-show

(20121205) no-show

(20121217) no-show

²Ä¤C²Õ

ª«²z¨tÀ³ª«¥| 498220341 ¤ýÑÔ¦w (never show up)

ª«²z¨tÀ³ª«¥| 499227063 §dªN°a

ª«²z¨tÀ³ª«¥| 498220234 Âö±ÒœÁ

ª«²z¨tÀ³ª«¥| 498220325 ³¯lÀM